Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 31 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 100 Replies) Science Schmience Thread (Read 441372 times)
spanky
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline



Posts: 1540
Location: Detroit-ish
Joined: Oct 23rd, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #330 - Dec 12th, 2007 at 8:00am
Print Post  
Probably not soon enough, the dolphins have learned our secret of thumbs...it is just a matter of time until they take over now.
  
Back to top
AIM  
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #331 - Dec 12th, 2007 at 1:18pm
Print Post  
Ack!  The Dolphins killed Willy!



X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #332 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 1:50pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Whales may have come from deer-like animal

By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer 28 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - It sounds like a stretch, but a new study suggests that the missing evolutionary link between whales and land animals is an odd raccoon-sized animal that looks like a long-tailed deer without antlers. Or an overgrown long-legged rat.

The creature is called Indohyus, and recently dug up fossils reveal some crucial evolutionary similarities between it and water-dwelling cetaceans, such as whales, dolphins and porpoises.

For years, the hippo has been the leading candidate for the closest land relative because of its similar DNA and whale-like features. So some scientists were skeptical of the new hypothesis by an Ohio anatomy professor whose work was being published Thursday in the journal Nature.

Still, some researchers have been troubled that hippos seem to have lived in the wrong part of the world and popped up too recently to be a whale ancestor.

Newer fossils point to the deer-like Indohyus. The animal is a "missing link" to the sister species to ancient whales, said Hans Thewissen, an anatomy professor at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine.

"As a zoo animal, it looks nothing like a whale," Thewissen said. But, he added, when it comes to anatomical features, the Indohyus "is quite strikingly like one."

Thewissen, who earlier published papers on fossils of what he called the first amphibious whale and the skeleton of the oldest known whale, studied hundreds of Indohyus bones unearthed from mudstone in the Kashmir region of India. From that cache of bones he created a composite skeleton of a 48 million-year-old creature.

The key finding connecting Indohyus to the whale is its thickened ear bone, something only seen in cetaceans. An examination of its teeth showed that the land-dwelling creature spent lots of time in the water and may have fed there, like hippos and whales. Also, the specific positioning and shape of certain molars connects Indohyus to the earliest whales, which are about 50 million years old, Thewissen said.

"The earliest whales didn't look like whales at all," Thewissen said. "It looked like a cross between a pig and a dog." They lost their legs and ability to walk on land about 40 million years ago, he said.

And the Indohyus? "A tiny little deer maybe the size of a raccoon and no antlers," Thewissen said. He said it most resembles the current African mousedeer, which has a rat-like nose and "when danger approaches, it jumps in the water and hides."

India and Pakistan were the general region where early whales lived. That matches with the Indohyus but not the early African hippos, Thewissen said. While modern-day cetaceans are known to be smart, early whales and Indohyus had small brains, the researcher said.

Other scientists were intrigued, but far from convinced, especially since the case for hippos has looked good, they said.

"While this new hypothesis for the origin of whales is compelling, it will require further testing, especially since other recent studies have suggested both hippos and Raoellids were involved in whale ancestry," San Diego State University biology professor Annalisa Berta said in an e-mail. Raoellids are the larger grouping of species that include the Indohyus.

Kenneth Rose, a professor of functional anatomy and evolution at Johns Hopkins University, said Thewissen didn't provide enough evidence to merit his conclusions. He also questioned the use of the composite skeleton. The ear bone thickness, the key trait that Thewissen used, was difficult to judge and seemed based on a single specimen, Rose said. Much of the work is based on teeth, and overall the remains preserved from this family of species are poorly preserved, he said.

Thewissen said there are problems with not enough well preserved fossils, but he said what's left makes a strong case for Indohyus as the closest land ancestor — with hippos as the closest living land relative.


http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20071219/capt.30b186edd83f4e3f8e82607b3a3def3...
Quote:
This undated handout artist rendering provided by Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy (NEOUCOM) shows a piece of a Indohyus skull.


Really?  Are you guys kidding?  A deer is the missing link between 6 ton animals and 600lb cows?

X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
b0b
GeekCrew Administrator
FTP Server
*****
Offline


The revolution will not
be televised.

Posts: 7803
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Joined: Oct 15th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #333 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:38pm
Print Post  
X wrote on Dec 19th, 2007 at 1:50pm:
600lb cows?


Dang, Pat!  I know Wes's mom has an eating disorder, but that's just not right!



-b0b
(...grabs the steak sauce.)
  

Back to top
IP Logged
 
MediaMaster
GeekCrew Administrator
FTP Server
*****
Offline


Holy Xenu!

Posts: 1884
Location: Detroit
Joined: Oct 15th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #334 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:46pm
Print Post  
I wonder how many different species are cataloged when there is only a genetic difference from one animal to another. They might find a baby deer as opposed to a large deer and catalog that as a new species. How are they to know? They don't know that animal's condition when it was alive, all they have is bones. A hunched over human with a big skull does not mean caveman! It could be an old old man!

Skulls keep changing over a period of someone's life. Someone that lives for 400 years is going to have a different shaped skull than a young person. Older people have larger eyebrows and more sunken eyes... what would a 600 year old have? Neanderthals are just old old people.

These folks find a skeleton and since it is not exactly like other animals, they will classify it as a new species. well goodness, a tiger skeleton is a different shape from a kitten but its still a bloody cat.

6 foot clam shells at the tops of mountains? still a clam. Back in the day when God created all of the creatures and us, they were all created perfect. When sin entered the world it started a breakdown of genetic data. We... and animals are all thousands of copies ranging back to ancient times.

Sure our genetics can change, but thats because our bodies and animal bodies were made to be able to adapt. God loves diversity. Animals that have become small cats or large cats became that way because of breeding, same as you would horses or dogs. You breed out undesirable traits. Except in nature it is random. It is not the adding of information it is the phasing out of certain traits or expanding on certain ones. Its why there are tigers with huge sabre teeth. Large cats with large teeth kept breeding till they became a dental nightmare. Or maybe  thats what cats originally looked like and the smaller toothed ones kept breeding till we had a house cat. We don't know!

Its the same with humanity. We were all created with brown skin. This brown has both light and dark melanin. The potential is there for both light and dark skin. When some people went up north, they needed less melanin so they became lighter. They no longer have the light melanin genes to produce a dark skinned person. Same with dark skinned. (aside from genetic defects... i.e. albinos)

Traits can be exaggerated through breeding. Several lines of kings in Europe only bred within their families to keep the bloodline pure. So if the family trait was large noses... this was blown WAY out of proportion because both parents had the same large nose gene(s).

Anyway what I am trying to say is what these folks keep finding is proof of changing traits, not links in between the kinds of animals. I do not consider a house cat and a tiger to be different... they are both cats, just one can kill me if it wants to. This happened through breeding, etc... not the adding of information through so called macro evolution.

trying to link together animals by "ear bone thickness" shows just how bloody off these scientists can be. They try to fit everything to evolution without actually having proof. Hippos between land animals and whales? wtf? What's to say such a link would even be around today? See to prove their theory they need a link between water and land animals! There is none! Keep searching and wasting money.

Creatures are going extinct ... I don't see any new kinds of animals sprouting up. Everything in this earth right now is breaking down... Humans are not getting better and better as evolution says things do over time... we are getting much more broken! genetic diseases, abnormalities, birth defects, the list goes on!


The very nature of the world is death, but Jesus is Life.

That is all.
  

"Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."&&&&John Adams&&
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
b0b
GeekCrew Administrator
FTP Server
*****
Offline


The revolution will not
be televised.

Posts: 7803
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Joined: Oct 15th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #335 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:48pm
Print Post  
MediaMaster wrote on Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:46pm:
The very nature of the world is death, but Jesus is Life.

That is all.


Well, there it is in a nutshell.

-b0b
(...clear, concise, and simple.)
  

Back to top
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #336 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:49pm
Print Post  
Quote:
The very nature of the world is death, but Jesus is Life.

That is all.


Oh yo hum...I fond the meaning to life la dee dah.

No, you're right Briney.  Everyone has presuppositions.  We have ours, and they have theirs.  The only difference.  In their worldview they can't support their beliefs.  In ours we have God and The Bible to base everything on.

X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MediaMaster
GeekCrew Administrator
FTP Server
*****
Offline


Holy Xenu!

Posts: 1884
Location: Detroit
Joined: Oct 15th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #337 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:51pm
Print Post  
Yea both require a leap of faith to believe. But our faith has different rewards, eh?
  

"Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."&&&&John Adams&&
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #338 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 2:59pm
Print Post  
Another difference is out faith is actually founded on something.  Whereas in their worldview they can't prove anything they claim or use.

X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
b0b
GeekCrew Administrator
FTP Server
*****
Offline


The revolution will not
be televised.

Posts: 7803
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Joined: Oct 15th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #339 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 3:51pm
Print Post  
Yeah, and we get a buffet once a month.  Top that, science!

-b0b
(...well, I do anyway.)
  

Back to top
IP Logged
 
b0b
GeekCrew Administrator
FTP Server
*****
Offline


The revolution will not
be televised.

Posts: 7803
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Joined: Oct 15th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #340 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 4:04pm
Print Post  
Quote:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10...

Year of global cooling
December 19, 2007

By David Deming - Al Gore says global warming is a planetary emergency. It is difficult to see how this can be so when record low temperatures are being set all over the world. In 2007, hundreds of people died, not from global warming, but from cold weather hazards.

Since the mid-19th century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 degrees Celsius. This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn't increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting colder. Neither the intensity nor the frequency of hurricanes has increased. The 2007 season was the third-quietest since 1966. In 2006 not a single hurricane made landfall in the U.S.

South America this year experienced one of its coldest winters in decades. In Buenos Aires, snow fell for the first time since the year 1918. Dozens of homeless people died from exposure. In Peru, 200 people died from the cold and thousands more became infected with respiratory diseases. Crops failed, livestock perished, and the Peruvian government declared a state of emergency.

Unexpected bitter cold swept the entire Southern Hemisphere in 2007. Johannesburg, South Africa, had the first significant snowfall in 26 years. Australia experienced the coldest June ever. In northeastern Australia, the city of Townsville underwent the longest period of continuously cold weather since 1941. In New Zealand, the weather turned so cold that vineyards were endangered.

Last January, $1.42 billion worth of California produce was lost to a devastating five-day freeze. Thousands of agricultural employees were thrown out of work. At the supermarket, citrus prices soared. In the wake of the freeze, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked President Bush to issue a disaster declaration for affected counties. A few months earlier, Mr. Schwarzenegger had enthusiastically signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, a law designed to cool the climate. California Sen. Barbara Boxer continues to push for similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

In April, a killing freeze destroyed 95 percent of South Carolina's peach crop, and 90 percent of North Carolina's apple harvest. At Charlotte, N.C., a record low temperature of 21 degrees Fahrenheit on April 8 was the coldest ever recorded for April, breaking a record set in 1923. On June 8, Denver recorded a new low of 31 degrees Fahrenheit. Denver's temperature records extend back to 1872.

Recent weeks have seen the return of unusually cold conditions to the Northern Hemisphere. On Dec. 7, St. Cloud, Minn., set a new record low of minus 15 degrees Fahrenheit. On the same date, record low temperatures were also recorded in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Extreme cold weather is occurring worldwide. On Dec. 4, in Seoul, Korea, the temperature was a record minus 5 degrees Celsius. Nov. 24, in Meacham, Ore., the minimum temperature was 12 degrees Fahrenheit colder than the previous record low set in 1952. The Canadian government warns that this winter is likely to be the coldest in 15 years.

Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri are just emerging from a destructive ice storm that left at least 36 people dead and a million without electric power. People worldwide are being reminded of what used to be common sense: Cold temperatures are inimical to human welfare and warm weather is beneficial. Left in the dark and cold, Oklahomans rushed out to buy electric generators powered by gasoline, not solar cells. No one seemed particularly concerned about the welfare of polar bears, penguins or walruses. Fossil fuels don't seem so awful when you're in the cold and dark.

If you think any of the preceding facts can falsify global warming, you're hopelessly naive. Nothing creates cognitive dissonance in the mind of a true believer. In 2005, a Canadian Greenpeace representative explained “global warming can mean colder, it can mean drier, it can mean wetter.” In other words, all weather variations are evidence for global warming. I can't make this stuff up.

Global warming has long since passed from scientific hypothesis to the realm of pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo.

David Deming is a geophysicist, an adjunct scholar with the National Center for Policy Analysis, and associate professor of Arts and Sciences at the University of Oklahoma.




But, but, but...!  It's still global warming!  That author is just too uninformed, misinformed, or lazy to understand what Mr. Gore knows!  I'm sure he'll be along shortly, golden statue in tow, to enlighten us all!

Bah!  Gore will continue preaching about global warming for the next decade.  When it becomes painfully obvious the climate is not changing, he will declare victory at having defeated human-caused global warming.

-b0b
(...did Cartman just crap treasure?)
  

Back to top
IP Logged
 
spanky
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline



Posts: 1540
Location: Detroit-ish
Joined: Oct 23rd, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #341 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 4:13pm
Print Post  
How could the person who invented the internet, slew manbearpig, and won the nobel prize for pussies be wrong?
  
Back to top
AIM  
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #342 - Dec 19th, 2007 at 4:43pm
Print Post  
Plus those pearls don't even go with that dress...

Smiley

X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #343 - Dec 26th, 2007 at 1:09am
Print Post  
http://www.expelledthemovie.com/video.php

I really want to see this movie...check out the trailer!

X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
X
Post Whore
FTP Server
******
Offline


And the truth shall set
you free

Posts: 4131
Joined: Oct 16th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Science Schmience Thread
Reply #344 - Dec 29th, 2007 at 1:39pm
Print Post  
I don't know how I missed this story...found it on AIG:

Quote:
Israeli researchers: 'Lucy' is not direct ancestor of humans
By JUDY SIEGEL-ITZKOVICH

Tel Aviv University anthropologists say they have disproven the theory that "Lucy" - the world-famous 3.2-million-year-old Australopithecus afarensis skeleton found in Ethiopia 33 years ago - is the last ancestor common to humans and another branch of the great apes family known as the "Robust hominids."
[The jaw bone of Lucy and the...]

The jaw bone of Lucy and the jaw bone of Australopithecus afarensis.
Photo: Courtesy

The specific structure found in Lucy also appears in a species called Australopithecus robustus. Prof. Yoel Rak and colleagues at the Sackler School of Medicine's department of anatomy and anthropology wrote, "The presence of the morphology in both the latter and Australopithecus afarensis and its absence in modern humans cast doubt on the role of [Lucy] as a common ancestor."

The robust hominids were discovered in southern Africa 69 years ago and are believed to have lived between 2 million and 1.2 million years ago. Their jaws and jaw muscles were adapted to the dry environment in which they lived.

Rak and colleagues studied 146 mature primate bone specimens, including those from modern humans, gorillas, chimpanzees and orangutans and found that the "ramus element" of the mandible connecting the lower jaw to the skull is like that of the robust forms, therefore eliminating the possibility that Lucy and her kind are Man's direct ancestors. They should therefore, the Israeli researchers said, "be placed as the beginning of the branch that evolved in parallel to ours."

Their research has just been published in the on-line edition of PNAS, the Proceedings of the [US] National Academy of Sciences.

Lucy, which means "you are wonderful" in Amharic, was discovered (40 percent of its skeleton) by the International Afar Research Expedition in Ethiopia's Awash Valley. Fitting the bones together, they said it was an upright walking hominid (Homo sapiens, which comprises modern Man and extinct manlike species). They later found its jaws and additional bones.

Further analysis led the Afar researchers to believe it was of a female, and the skeleton listed as AL 288-1 was nicknamed Lucy because the Beatles' song "Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds" was often played at the camp.

The specimen was only 1.1 meters tall, estimated to weigh 29 kilograms and look somewhat like a common chimpanzee. Although it had a small brain, the pelvis and leg bones were almost identical in function with those of modern humans, proving that these hominids had walked erect.

Although fossils closer to chimpanzees have been found since then, Lucy - which is housed in the national museum in Addis Ababa - is prized by anthropologists who study Man's origin.

Rak and his colleagues also wrote that the structure of Lucy's mandibular ramus closely matches that of gorillas, which was "unexpected" because chimpanzees are the closest living relatives of humans, and not gorillas.


Now if they'll only admit that she's a monkey...I'd be ok with the findings here.

From another article:

Quote:
The Chronicle’s Lisa Falkenberg records a few of the diverse opinions overheard at the exhibit (fully titled “Lucy’s Legacy: The Hidden Treasures of Ethiopia”):

    She walked over to examine the lifelike 3 ˝foot, hairy, half-smiling model of what scientists believe Lucy looked like and had her own questions.

    “They don’t have any finger bones, so how do they know her hand was like that?” Marla Bryant asked her mother, Leona Rice.

    “They’re guessing,” Rice replied.

    Young Garrett processed the scene for a few more minutes and then shrugged.

    “She’s just a monkey,” he declared, and then walked off.


X
  

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. - Max Payne
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 31
Send TopicPrint